Read articles from Global

March 25, 2026 by filtermag.org

The IMF emphasizes risk-proportionate taxation on nicotine, alcohol, and sugar products to align with harm caused, challenging current tax policies. Economist Christoph B. Rosenberg and tax expert Marius Van Oordt discuss the need to adapt taxes based on harm levels of new products like vapes, emphasizing the importance of combining tax and health data for policymaking. The article points out the success of different tax strategies in countries like New Zealand and the negative impact of misaligned taxes in places like India and Ireland. The IMF's support for harm reduction advocates is seen as influential in shaping healthier societies.

March 24, 2026 by euperspectives.eu

In response to comments by Olivér Várhelyi, Clive Bates co-signed an open letter addressed to Ursula von der Leyen, urging a more balanced approach to lower-risk nicotine products. In an interview with EU Perspectives, he emphasized that policymakers need to carefully weigh public health goals against unintended consequences. His main argument is that overly strict or misguided regulation could undermine harm reduction efforts and ultimately worsen outcomes instead of improving them.

March 23, 2026 by thecritic.co.uk

Vaping has recently been associated with several negative news stories, including a fire near Glasgow Central Station and allegations of misconduct involving vape shop owners in Dudley. There are also reports from Kent linking vape sharing to meningitis cases, although this connection is considered unproven. Experts suggest that the Glasgow fire was more likely caused by faulty wiring rather than e-cigarettes. While some issues, such as the exploitation of minors and underage vape sales, are serious and illegal, they are not caused by vaping itself. The main problem appears to be weak enforcement of existing laws related to tax evasion, counterfeit products, and illegal sales.

March 23, 2026 by gfn.tv

Governments insist their nicotine policies are “evidence-based.” But a closer look reveals cherry-picked findings, flawed comparisons, and sensational claims that don’t withstand scrutiny. In this GFN interviews, independent tobacco scientist Dr. Ian Fearon explains how weak research and distorted interpretations shape global nicotine policy. From the misuse of correlation to media amplification of questionable studies, Fearon shows how flawed science fuels prohibitionist thinking—leaving smokers misinformed about safer alternatives that could reduce the harms of smoking.

March 19, 2026 by daily-pouch.com

Tobacco control public health communication may manipulate headlines and lack evidence. A Health eNews article questioned the safety of nicotine pouches without proper support. The use of misleading headlines influences public perception, similar to past misconceptions about vaping. Misrepresenting the safety of nicotine pouches and tobacco products is prevalent. Dr. Milind Mehta raises concerns without substantial evidence, fueling fear unjustly. The comparison to smokeless tobacco products lacks relevance to modern alternatives like nicotine pouches. Such misinformation harms smokers seeking safer options. There is a clear need for accurate information in tobacco control discourse to guide consumers effectively and prevent false beliefs perpetuated by sensationalized claims.

March 18, 2026 by substack.com

This is the second post (see first post) complementing and expanding the excellent Substack by Chris Snowdon on the weakness of evidence against risks of “passive vaping” (exposure to “second hand” or the aerosol exhaled by vapers). This Substack post continues my previous critique of studies mentioned by Chris. I will examine what happens under special conditions with multiple vapers producing a large mass of exhaled vaping aerosol (EVA). [...]

March 18, 2026 by substack.com

I dedicate this post and the next one (part 2) to complement and expand the excellent Substack by Chris Snowdon on the weakness of evidence against risks of “passive vaping” (exposure to “second hand” or the aerosol exhaled by vapers).

March 18, 2026 by planetofthevapes.co.uk

A recent study by Dr. Konstantinos Farsalinos shows that modern tobacco-free nicotine pouches are among the least harmful nicotine products in terms of chemical exposure. The research indicates that harmful chemicals in these pouches are largely undetectable or present at negligible levels compared to cigarettes. Published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, the paper highlights that nicotine pouches occupy the lowest end of the toxicant risk continuum. Harmful constituents, including tobacco-specific nitrosamines, are minimal compared to both snus and combustible cigarettes. As a result, smokers who switch to nicotine pouches can achieve reductions in toxicant exposure similar to those seen with complete smoking cessation.

March 18, 2026 by springer.com

Nicotine pouches are a new, tobacco-free oral product designed as a lower-risk alternative for smokers who cannot or do not want to quit. They are derived from the concept of Swedish snus but completely eliminate the tobacco leaf. Current evidence suggests that nicotine pouches deliver nicotine effectively while containing fewer harmful chemicals compared to combustible cigarettes. Studies indicate they may support smoking reduction or cessation, although long-term data are still limited. Overall, nicotine pouches could play a role in tobacco harm reduction and potentially reduce the public health burden associated with smoking.

March 18, 2026 by substack.com

The text reviews studies on the safety of passive vaping or exposure to exhaled aerosol from e-cigarettes. Critiques of previous studies are presented, focusing on the emission of vaping aerosol under various conditions. Studies on nicotine overdose risks in bystanders, aerosol chemistry, and safety of propylene glycol inhalation are discussed. Criticisms of alarmist claims regarding vaping events, vape shop pollution, and unreliable studies on aerosol measurement methods are outlined. The conclusion emphasizes that exhaled vaping aerosol is diluted, transient, and does not pose significant health risks compared to other indoor pollutants like cooking aerosols. Physical processes, not chemical reactions, drive its behavior in the environment.