Smoking in Australia
In Australia, smoking is legal and tobacco products are subject to regulations. Cigarettes are allowed for sale and use and can be legally purchased in stores, online, and through vending machines. The importation of cigarettes for trade is also allowed with a license. Furthermore, health warnings on cigarette packaging are required, the minimum legal age for their purchase is 18 years, and there are legal restrictions on smoking in public places. Cigarettes are subject to an excise tax value of 67.88% and a total taxation rate of 76.98%. Despite these measures, smoking still poses a significant public health concern in Australia. As of 2024, the country had approximately 2.4 million current smokers, representing a current smoking prevalence of 11% among adults aged 15 years and older. The prevalence was recorded to be 12.5% in 2022. The current prevalence was higher among males (12.9%) than among females (9.3%) in 2024. In 2021, smoking led to an estimated 12,838 deaths, including 7,833 deaths among males and 5,005 among females. Overall, smoking was attributable to 7.33% of all deaths in the country, including 8.44% of male deaths and 6.07% of female deaths.
Read articles from Australia
August 10, 2026 by abc.net.au
The rise of illegal tobacco in Australia
A sustained rise in vaping alongside a decline in smoking tells an important public health story. Behaviour is changing, and policy should seek to understand why rather than assume all nicotine trends move in the same direction. When adults replace cigarettes with smoke-free alternatives, the potential for reducing smoking-related disease changes as well. The challenge for regulators is to encourage that transition while continuing to prevent youth uptake and maintaining strong consumer safeguards.
August 10, 2026 by prlog.org
Australia Bans Every Legal Nicotine Pouch as Illicit Market Hits 80%
Australia is becoming a case study in what happens when legal routes are closed while demand remains. With nicotine pouches banned and the illicit market reportedly reaching extreme levels, consumers are pushed towards products with less oversight, weaker safeguards and no accountable supply chain. That is not control; it is displacement. A functioning tobacco policy should bring lower-risk products into regulated markets, not leave cigarettes and illicit sellers as the easiest options.
August 04, 2026 by pearlsandirritations.com
Time to reform Australia’s failed policy on smoking and vaping
Australia’s smoking and vaping policy has created a system where cigarettes remain easy to buy, while safer alternatives are treated as a problem to be contained. That contradiction has weakened trust, fuelled illicit supply and made switching harder for adults who smoke. Reform should start with a simple principle: regulate nicotine products according to risk, not political discomfort. A policy that keeps the most harmful product as the easiest option is not protecting public health.
August 03, 2026 by substack.com
Two Presentations, One Crisis: When the Evidence Points Beyond Enforcement
Two presentations can reveal one crisis when the same evidence points are interpreted in opposite ways. In nicotine policy, that crisis is not only about disagreement — it is about whether science is being used to clarify risk or to defend existing positions. When data on safer products is filtered through ideology, smokers may be left with confusion instead of useful guidance. Public health needs evidence that informs decisions, not evidence selected to protect a narrative.
July 24, 2026 by substack.com
The Conversation Australia Needed to Have
The National Press Club discussion addressed Australia's illicit tobacco crisis, emphasizing the need to move beyond enforcement to consider broader policy implications. Speakers highlighted the unintended consequences of current strategies, including the role of public policy in fueling the illicit market. Different perspectives were presented, underscoring the need for a more comprehensive national strategy with measurable outcomes. The discussion also explored the intersection of science, regulation, and harm reduction in tobacco control. Ultimately, the event encouraged a reevaluation of Australia's approach to reducing smoking rates while addressing the complexities of the illicit tobacco trade and the need for evidence-based policy decisions.
July 16, 2026 by substack.com
The Bootleggers and Baptists Paradox: How Anti Vaping Campaigns Can Protect the Cigarette Market
Strange alliances often shape bad policy. In tobacco control, moral campaigners and commercial interests can end up pulling in the same direction when restrictions make legal, safer alternatives harder to access. The result is a paradox: policies presented as public health protection may leave the cigarette market stronger. Following the incentives matters, because the people harmed most are usually the smokers with the fewest good options.
July 13, 2026 by substack.com
Who Benefits from the Status Quo? - Part 2
The real question is not only whether tobacco policy is working, but who is served when it fails. A system that keeps cigarettes accessible while casting doubt on safer alternatives does not disrupt the market — it reinforces it. Smokers are told to quit, yet the most practical tools for switching are often taxed, restricted or dismissed. If public health is serious about reducing disease, it must stop protecting the conditions that keep combustion dominant.
July 13, 2026 by substack.com
Who Benefits from the Status Quo? - Part 3 Final
When tobacco policy preserves the status quo, the most harmful product remains protected. Cigarettes stay familiar, available and profitable, while lower-risk alternatives face suspicion, restriction and misinformation. The result is a system that talks about reducing smoking but often makes switching harder in practice. Public health should be willing to challenge the incentives that keep combustion at the centre of the market.
July 10, 2026 by substack.com
Who Benefits from the Status Quo? - Part 1
The status quo in tobacco policy has winners — and they are rarely the smokers who need better options. When cigarettes remain easy to buy while safer nicotine products are restricted, taxed or stigmatised, the market continues to favour combustion. Public health should ask who benefits when harm reduction is blocked and misinformation spreads. A system that preserves cigarette use while limiting alternatives is not neutral; it protects the most harmful product by default.
June 26, 2026 by healthcoalition.org.nz
Cutting excise tax is not going to solve illicit tobacco: here’s why
Cutting tobacco excise alone will not fix illicit trade if the wider policy environment still drives consumers towards unregulated markets. Illegal tobacco is shaped by organised supply chains, enforcement gaps, high demand and the lack of realistic alternatives for smokers. A stronger response should combine targeted enforcement with harm reduction, accurate risk communication and legal access to lower-risk nicotine products. The goal should be reducing smoking-related harm, not relying on tax policy alone.
- Page 1 of 57