Smoking in Australia
In Australia, smoking is legal and tobacco products are subject to regulations. Cigarettes are allowed for sale and use and can be legally purchased in stores, online, and through vending machines. The importation of cigarettes for trade is also allowed with a license. Furthermore, health warnings on cigarette packaging are required, the minimum legal age for their purchase is 18 years, and there are legal restrictions on smoking in public places. Cigarettes are subject to an excise tax value of 67.88% and a total taxation rate of 76.98%. Despite these measures, smoking still poses a significant public health concern in Australia. As of 2024, the country had approximately 2.4 million current smokers, representing a current smoking prevalence of 11% among adults aged 15 years and older. The prevalence was recorded to be 12.5% in 2022. The current prevalence was higher among males (12.9%) than among females (9.3%) in 2024. In 2021, smoking led to an estimated 12,838 deaths, including 7,833 deaths among males and 5,005 among females. Overall, smoking was attributable to 7.33% of all deaths in the country, including 8.44% of male deaths and 6.07% of female deaths.
Read articles from Australia
October 29, 2026 by substack.com
When Listening Becomes Another Way to Lecture
Interviews with 20 illicit tobacco users in New Zealand reveal how financial hardship, nicotine dependence and frustration with tobacco policies influence purchasing decisions.
The findings raise questions about whether public health campaigns focused on changing consumer attitudes adequately address the economic pressures driving illicit sales.
Effective tobacco control should consider affordability, taxation and access to cessation support, including lower-risk nicotine alternatives. Understanding consumers' experiences is essential to developing policies that reduce smoking-related harm rather than reinforce existing barriers.
October 28, 2026 by substack.com
When the Data Point to Price but the Answer is still Enforcement.
Illicit tobacco use has risen sharply among two disadvantaged populations in Australia, with a new study identifying price as the main motivation. Illegal cigarettes were reportedly selling for a fraction of the legal retail price, creating strong financial incentives to purchase outside regulated channels.
Despite these findings, the proposed policy response continues to emphasise enforcement and supply restrictions. The analysis raises questions about the limits of high tobacco taxation, particularly among financially vulnerable smokers.
Reducing smoking-related harm requires addressing affordability, consumer behaviour and access to effective cessation support, including lower-risk nicotine alternatives, rather than relying on enforcement alone.
October 27, 2026 by vietnam.vn
Smokeless products: Science doesn't wait for policy.
Scientific research on smoke-free nicotine products continues to advance, even in countries where these products face restrictions or outright bans.
Singapore, Thailand and Australia continue to examine consumer behaviour and regulatory outcomes, while research from Japan and the United States is contributing to a better understanding of toxicant exposure and potential health effects.
For Vietnam, these international experiences highlight the importance of ongoing scientific evaluation. Distinguishing between nicotine products, assessing relative risks and monitoring real-world outcomes can support more informed tobacco control policies without overlooking the uncertainties surrounding long-term health effects.
October 22, 2026 by gfn.tv
Why Are Nicotine Pouches Sold Through Pharmacies in Canada? | #GFN26ScienceLab
Canada's pharmacy-only model for nicotine pouches has created an unusual regulatory imbalance. Since 2024, authorised pouches have been restricted to pharmacy sales, while unauthorised products remain widely available through online and retail channels.
At GFN 2026, pharmacist Todd Prochnau examined the practical consequences of this approach, including barriers to access, additional pressure on pharmacists and inconsistent risk communication.
The experience raises important questions about whether restricting regulated smoke-free alternatives supports smoking cessation or unintentionally strengthens the illicit market. Effective tobacco harm reduction requires both appropriate safeguards and realistic consumer access.
October 22, 2026 by substack.com
Before the Next Victory Lap
Australia’s smoking statistics are raising new questions about the effectiveness of its tobacco control policies. The 2026 Wesfarmers Health Index estimates daily smoking at 10.1%, considerably higher than the government's reported figure of 5.6%, although differences in survey methods may explain part of the gap.
The discrepancy highlights the need for transparent data and closer examination of smoking trends, particularly among disadvantaged communities. Beyond measuring declining prevalence, Australia must ensure that adults who continue to smoke have access to effective cessation support and regulated, lower-risk nicotine alternatives.
October 21, 2026 by protectingtaxpayers.org
Handed Nicotine Rules Should be Eliminated to Help Smokers Quit
Pennsylvania's new nicotine regulations under Act 57 could significantly restrict access to smoke-free alternatives, with only 159 products included on the state's approved list.
The Taxpayers Protection Alliance warns that these restrictions may limit consumer choice, affect small retailers and encourage illicit trade. With around 1.4 million adults smoking in Pennsylvania, the potential consequences for tobacco harm reduction deserve attention. Effective regulation should balance product safety and youth protection with access to lower-risk alternatives for adults seeking to quit smoking.
October 20, 2026 by aap.com.au
Minister gets history wrong on tobacco enforcement
Australia’s tobacco enforcement debate has come under scrutiny after an AAP fact-check challenged claims that previous governments failed to invest in tackling illicit tobacco.
Although tobacco excise increased substantially under the former Coalition government, funding was also allocated to enforcement programmes, including the Illicit Tobacco Taskforce. Spending on anti-smoking advertising, however, was reduced.
The findings highlight the importance of accuracy and accountability in tobacco policy. Addressing illicit trade requires more than political claims or higher taxes; it calls for effective enforcement, smoking cessation support and a broader focus on reducing tobacco-related harm.
October 20, 2026 by aap.com.au
Minister gets history wrong on tobacco enforcement
Australia’s tobacco enforcement debate has come under scrutiny after an AAP fact-check challenged claims that previous governments failed to invest in tackling illicit tobacco.
Although tobacco excise increased substantially under the former Coalition government, funding was also allocated to enforcement programmes, including the Illicit Tobacco Taskforce. Spending on anti-smoking advertising, however, was reduced.
The findings highlight the importance of accuracy and accountability in tobacco policy. Addressing illicit trade requires more than political claims or higher taxes; it calls for effective enforcement, smoking cessation support and a broader focus on reducing tobacco-related harm.
October 20, 2026 by aap.com.au
Minister gets history wrong on tobacco enforcement
Australia’s tobacco enforcement debate has come under scrutiny after an AAP fact-check challenged claims that previous governments failed to invest in tackling illicit tobacco.
Although tobacco excise increased substantially under the former Coalition government, funding was also allocated to enforcement programmes, including the Illicit Tobacco Taskforce. Spending on anti-smoking advertising, however, was reduced.
The findings highlight the importance of accuracy and accountability in tobacco policy. Addressing illicit trade requires more than political claims or higher taxes; it calls for effective enforcement, smoking cessation support and a broader focus on reducing tobacco-related harm.
October 14, 2026 by substack.com
THR Doesn’t Need Nicotine to Be Innocent
Tobacco harm reduction does not require nicotine to be innocent. It requires honesty about where the greatest harm comes from. Nicotine can cause dependence and should not be promoted casually, but cigarettes are deadly because they burn tobacco and expose users to toxic smoke. The case for safer nicotine products rests on reducing that exposure — not on pretending nicotine has no risks.
- Page 1 of 61