Smoking in Australia
In Australia, smoking is legal and tobacco products are subject to regulations. Cigarettes are allowed for sale and use and can be legally purchased in stores, online, and through vending machines. The importation of cigarettes for trade is also allowed with a license. Furthermore, health warnings on cigarette packaging are required, the minimum legal age for their purchase is 18 years, and there are legal restrictions on smoking in public places. Cigarettes are subject to an excise tax value of 67.88% and a total taxation rate of 76.98%. Despite these measures, smoking still poses a significant public health concern in Australia. As of 2024, the country had approximately 2.4 million current smokers, representing a current smoking prevalence of 11% among adults aged 15 years and older. The prevalence was recorded to be 12.5% in 2022. The current prevalence was higher among males (12.9%) than among females (9.3%) in 2024. In 2021, smoking led to an estimated 12,838 deaths, including 7,833 deaths among males and 5,005 among females. Overall, smoking was attributable to 7.33% of all deaths in the country, including 8.44% of male deaths and 6.07% of female deaths.
Read articles from Australia
September 15, 2026 by newsroom.co.nz
Five policies to get Aotearoa back on the smokefree track
Aotearoa’s smokefree goal needs policy that matches both ambition and real behaviour. Lower smoking rates will not be secured through slogans alone; they require targeted support, credible enforcement, attention to inequities and realistic alternatives for adults who still smoke. Vaping and other lower-risk options should be assessed by their role in reducing combustion, not by whether they fit an abstinence-only model. Getting back on track means focusing on outcomes: fewer cigarettes, fewer deaths and fewer communities left behind.
September 14, 2026 by github.io
How Australia has Lost Control of the Nicotine Market?
Australia’s nicotine policy has become a case study in disinformation with real-world consequences. Smokers are told to quit, yet lower-risk alternatives are restricted, misrepresented or pushed into channels with less oversight. That confusion protects cigarettes more than it protects public health. Evidence-based communication should explain relative risk clearly, support adult switching and stop treating harm reduction as a threat to tobacco control.
September 11, 2026 by vapingpost.com
Some Sense at Last? Coalition Proposes 80% Tobacco Tax Cut and Legal Vapes to Break Australia’s Black Market
In line with what tobacco harm reduction experts have been suggesting all along, Australia’s opposition party wants to slash tobacco taxes and legalise regulated vapes and nicotine pouches to undermine the country’s booming black market.
September 08, 2026 by snusforumet.se
Australia grapples with tobacco tax hike fallout
Australia’s tobacco tax fallout shows the danger of treating price as a standalone public health tool. Excessive excise can push smokers towards illegal cigarettes, strengthen criminal supply chains and weaken trust in regulation. The goal should be lower smoking, not a larger black market. Tax policy works best alongside realistic enforcement and legal access to lower-risk alternatives that make leaving combustion easier.
September 08, 2026 by consideratepouchers.org
New Zealand decided to legalise pouches. Then nothing happened.
Legalising nicotine pouches was never supposed to cause a public health spectacle. New Zealand’s experience suggests that regulated access can simply give adult smokers another smoke-free option without the chaos often predicted by opponents. That matters because fear-based arguments frequently assume the worst before a product is even allowed to operate under rules. Sensible regulation can manage risk while still making room for alternatives that help move people away from cigarettes.
September 07, 2026 by quitlikesweden.org
The Three A's: Why Access Decides Who Quits Smoking, and Who Doesn't
Access can decide whether quitting smoking is realistic or only recommended. Safer nicotine alternatives need to be available, affordable and acceptable enough for adult smokers to actually use them. Sweden’s experience shows the importance of meeting people with practical options, not just warnings about harm. Public health progress depends on making the route away from combustion easier to take.
September 04, 2026 by politico.com
Ending ‘Christmas for criminals’: Coalition's tobacco tax cut argument
Australia’s tobacco excise debate shows how quickly public health policy can become an organised crime opportunity. Extremely high taxes may be designed to discourage smoking, but they can also make illegal cigarettes profitable enough to sustain violence, corruption and a market beyond normal controls. Enforcement alone cannot fix incentives this large. A credible strategy should reduce smoking while keeping consumers inside legal channels and making lower-risk nicotine alternatives easier to access than illicit tobacco.
September 03, 2026 by liberal.org.au
The Coalition’s Plan To Kill The Illicit Tobacco Market And Smash The Gangs
Australia’s illicit tobacco crisis cannot be solved by raids alone. The Coalition’s plan recognises a hard lesson: organised crime thrives where taxes create huge margins, legal alternatives are restricted and consumers are pushed outside regulated channels. Cutting criminal profit must go hand in hand with bringing vapes and nicotine pouches into an accountable adult market. Public health is stronger when enforcement, taxation and harm reduction all point in the same direction.
September 03, 2026 by clearingtheair.eu
Tobacco Control Advocates: Big Tobacco’s Useful Idiots
Tobacco control loses credibility when opposition to industry turns into opposition to harm reduction itself. Cigarette companies deserve scrutiny, but that does not make every argument for safer nicotine products a tobacco industry tactic. Adult smokers are poorly served by a debate that treats reduced-risk options as contamination rather than opportunity. Public health should be able to reject industry misconduct while still recognising evidence that helps people move away from combustion.
September 01, 2026 by substack.com
Two Countries, the Same Evidence, and Two Very Different Ideas About Helping Smokers Quit
The same evidence can lead two countries in opposite directions. One government may see safer nicotine products as part of the route away from smoking, while another treats them as a problem to restrict alongside cigarettes. That difference is not scientific; it is political. Public health policy should be judged by what it enables smokers to do in practice, not by how tightly it defends old assumptions.
- Page 1 of 59