Read articles from Europe
July 15, 2026 by filtermag.org
Disposables Banned, Flavors Next: Irish Vape Crackdown Gathers Pace
Remove the products adults actually use to stay off cigarettes, and the outcome may not be the one policymakers expect. Ireland’s proposed restrictions on disposable vapes and flavours risk making vaping less accessible, less appealing and less useful for people trying to quit smoking. Protecting young people matters, but so does avoiding a policy that pushes adults back towards cigarettes or into informal markets. Good regulation should reduce harm in practice, not just look tough on paper.
July 15, 2026 by clearingtheair.eu
One in five trying to quit vaping used cigarettes, survey finds
A survey by Action on Smoking and Health reveals that 19% of adults attempting to quit vaping used cigarettes, potentially due to misconceptions about the risks. Beliefs about the harm of smoking versus vaping influenced these choices. While vaping has aided 3.3 million former smokers and daily vaping has surpassed smoking in Great Britain, misconceptions persist with 52% of current smokers believing vaping is as harmful as smoking. The UK government is considering further regulations on vaping to prevent youth uptake. Cancer Research UK supports regulations that deter non-smokers while recognizing vaping's harm reduction for smokers. Balancing visibility while highlighting differences between vaping and smoking is crucial to prevent setbacks in smoking cessation efforts.
July 13, 2026 by daily-pouch.com
The False Claims That Keep People Smoking
False claims about smoke-free nicotine products do not make people safer — they can keep people smoking. When adults are told that lower-risk alternatives are just as harmful as cigarettes, confusion replaces informed choice and the incentive to switch weakens. Misinformation protects the product causing the greatest harm: combustible tobacco. Public health needs honesty about risk, not messages that make all nicotine products look the same.
July 13, 2026 by observer.co.uk
Regulators accused of stubbing out Sweden’s ‘solution’ to smoking
Sweden’s success in reducing smoking should be studied, not sidelined. By allowing adults access to smoke-free nicotine alternatives, the country has shown that tobacco control can move faster when policy reflects relative risk. If regulators ignore that lesson, they risk protecting outdated approaches while smokers elsewhere are denied more practical routes away from cigarettes. The goal should be less disease and fewer deaths — not loyalty to one narrow model of quitting.
July 13, 2026 by substack.com
Who Benefits from the Status Quo? - Part 3 Final
When tobacco policy preserves the status quo, the most harmful product remains protected. Cigarettes stay familiar, available and profitable, while lower-risk alternatives face suspicion, restriction and misinformation. The result is a system that talks about reducing smoking but often makes switching harder in practice. Public health should be willing to challenge the incentives that keep combustion at the centre of the market.
July 13, 2026 by clearingtheair.eu
Ireland urged to rethink vape policy as smoking decline stalls
Ireland’s stalled smoking decline should prompt a serious rethink of vape policy. When progress slows, restricting the very products that may help adults move away from cigarettes risks making the problem harder to solve. Youth protection matters, but it should not come at the cost of leaving smokers with fewer practical alternatives. A better approach would focus on enforcement, accurate risk communication and regulated access to lower-risk products.
July 10, 2026 by substack.com
Who Benefits from the Status Quo? - Part 1
The status quo in tobacco policy has winners — and they are rarely the smokers who need better options. When cigarettes remain easy to buy while safer nicotine products are restricted, taxed or stigmatised, the market continues to favour combustion. Public health should ask who benefits when harm reduction is blocked and misinformation spreads. A system that preserves cigarette use while limiting alternatives is not neutral; it protects the most harmful product by default.
July 10, 2026 by smokefreesweden.org
Flood of anti-science is trapping smokers with deadly cigarettes
International experts warn of an anti-science campaign misrepresenting safer nicotine products, leading smokers to believe vaping is as harmful as smoking. The false perceptions hinder smokers from switching to less harmful alternatives, increasing health risks. Surveys show a growing number of smokers hold misconceptions about vaping, with many believing it is as harmful as smoking. Few smokers are aware that vaping is less harmful. Dr. Delon Human stresses the importance of accurate information and access to safer alternatives, citing Sweden's success in reducing smoking rates through such measures. Mistaken beliefs about vaping's dangers fuel a deadly cycle of cigarette addiction.
July 10, 2026 by rbc.ua
'Cigarettes during wars were more important than food.' Interview with professor about real harm of tobacco
War changes the meaning of cigarettes. What may look like a simple consumer product can become a coping mechanism, a source of routine and even a form of social currency under extreme stress. That reality does not make smoking safe, but it does show why public health must understand behaviour before trying to control it. Harm reduction starts by recognising why people use nicotine — especially when life is shaped by trauma, pressure and uncertainty.
July 10, 2026 by clivebates.com
UK government intensifies anti-vaping, pro-smoking agenda
The UK risks sending smokers a dangerous message: cigarettes are familiar, but safer alternatives are suspect. Intensifying anti-vaping campaigns may feel protective, yet it can deepen confusion about relative risk and make switching less attractive. Adult smokers need accurate information, not fear-based communication that blurs the difference between smoke and vapour. Public health should be making the escape from cigarettes clearer, not cloudier.