Smoking in Australia
In Australia, smoking is legal and tobacco products are subject to regulations. Cigarettes are allowed for sale and use and can be legally purchased in stores, online, and through vending machines. The importation of cigarettes for trade is also allowed with a license. Furthermore, health warnings on cigarette packaging are required, the minimum legal age for their purchase is 18 years, and there are legal restrictions on smoking in public places. Cigarettes are subject to an excise tax value of 67.88% and a total taxation rate of 76.98%. Despite these measures, smoking still poses a significant public health concern in Australia. As of 2024, the country had approximately 2.4 million current smokers, representing a current smoking prevalence of 11% among adults aged 15 years and older. The prevalence was recorded to be 12.5% in 2022. The current prevalence was higher among males (12.9%) than among females (9.3%) in 2024. In 2021, smoking led to an estimated 12,838 deaths, including 7,833 deaths among males and 5,005 among females. Overall, smoking was attributable to 7.33% of all deaths in the country, including 8.44% of male deaths and 6.07% of female deaths.
Read articles from Australia
May 12, 2026 by archive.is
Australia’s tax war on smoking has been a disaster. And we won’t do anything about it | Alexander Downer
Australia’s aggressive tobacco tax policy is facing growing criticism as concerns mount over the expansion of the illicit cigarette market. Former foreign minister Alexander Downer argues that repeated excise increases have pushed legal cigarette prices among the highest in the world, while fuelling demand for cheaper illegal products. According to critics, the strategy has weakened government revenues, strengthened organised crime networks and potentially undermined reductions in smoking rates. At the same time, vaping products—subject to different tax treatment—have become increasingly popular as smokers seek lower-cost alternatives. The debate highlights broader questions about whether excessively high taxation can become counterproductive when consumers shift towards unregulated markets instead of quitting nicotine altogether.
May 05, 2026 by aliveadvocacymovement.com
When Canberra Holds an Inquiry Into a Crisis It Helped Create, But Leaves the Consumers Outside the Room!
Australia’s vaping inquiry in Canberra is drawing criticism for examining a crisis that many argue was shaped by its own policies. Commentary highlights that restrictive regulations and prohibition-style measures have contributed to the growth of illicit markets and reduced access to regulated alternatives. Despite this, concerns are raised that the voices of consumers—those directly affected by these changes—are largely absent from the discussion. Critics argue that excluding users from policy conversations risks overlooking real-world consequences and lived experiences. The situation reflects a broader tension between top-down regulation and the need for more inclusive, evidence-based policymaking. At its core, the debate questions whether effective public health strategies can be developed without engaging those most impacted.
May 04, 2026 by gfn.tv
TOBACCO CONTROL FEEDS AUSTRALIA'S BLACK MARKET — GFN•TV
Australia’s strict tobacco and vaping policies are increasingly linked to the rapid growth of an illicit nicotine market. Insights from recent discussions suggest that heavy taxation and prohibitive regulations have shifted a large share of demand into criminal channels. Estimates indicate that a significant portion of tobacco sales—and the vast majority of vaping products—now circulate outside the legal system. Experts argue that these conditions have created lucrative opportunities for organised crime, which has stepped in to meet persistent consumer demand.The situation highlights concerns that overly restrictive policies may reduce legal access without eliminating use. More broadly, it raises questions about whether prohibition-focused approaches can effectively control nicotine markets without unintended consequences.
April 30, 2026 by worldvapersalliance.com
The EU's Australian Nightmare
Europe’s approach to nicotine regulation is increasingly being compared to Australia’s strict and controversial policies. Critics warn that heavy restrictions on vaping and alternative products risk repeating what they describe as a “policy failure” seen in Australia. Evidence from that model suggests that limiting access to safer alternatives can drive consumers toward black markets rather than reduce nicotine use. There are also concerns that such measures may undermine harm reduction efforts by discouraging smokers from switching away from combustible cigarettes. Supporters of a more balanced approach argue that regulation should be guided by scientific evidence rather than prohibition. The debate highlights broader tensions over whether Europe should prioritise strict control or pragmatic harm reduction in shaping future public health policy.
April 21, 2026 by wiley.com
Has Australia lost control of its tobacco and nicotine markets?
Recent scientific research continues to examine patterns of vaping use and their implications for public health. Large-scale international data suggest that while experimentation with e-cigarettes among young people is relatively common, regular or frequent use remains significantly lower. This distinction between occasional and habitual use is increasingly important in shaping how nicotine trends are interpreted. Researchers emphasize that most adolescent vaping appears to be infrequent rather than sustained behavior. At the same time, the findings highlight the need for targeted policies, such as age restrictions and product regulation, to prevent uptake among youth. The study contributes to a broader evidence base informing ongoing debates about vaping, youth behavior, and appropriate regulatory responses.
April 17, 2026 by gfn.tv
GFN.TV Interviews #86 | POLICY COLLAPSE | Vape Bans and Australia’s Illicit Tobacco Crisis
One of the world’s leading harm reduction advocates sees disaster unfolding in Australia. Sky-high tobacco taxes and sweeping restrictions on nicotine vaping were meant to reduce harm—but instead, they’ve fueled a booming illicit market, siphoned billions in public revenue, and triggered a wave of violence tied to organized crime. In this GFN Interviews, Dr. Alex Wodak explains how Australia’s approach has veered into “quasi prohibition,” driving demand into the black market and overwhelming enforcement.
March 23, 2026 by youtube.com
Australia's Policy Failure: Why Making E-Cigarettes Prescription-Only Is Problematic
I discuss Australia's approach to e-cigarettes, which essentially limits them to prescription-only. I give 5 reasons why this is a problematic approach; how this overly restrictive regulation has created a violent illicit market; and compare how Australia has fared vs. New Zealand which embraces harm reduction with e-cigarettes.
March 23, 2026 by scoop.co.nz
NZ Risks Australia-Style Tobacco Crime Surge If Harm Reduction Is Ignored
CAPHRA warns that New Zealand could repeat Australia’s illicit tobacco crisis if it relies too much on restrictions, high prices, and enforcement. The concern follows reports that tobacco smuggling in New Zealand is becoming more organised and large-scale. Officials fear this could lead to gang-related violence similar to what has been seen in Australia. CAPHRA’s Executive Coordinator, Nancy Loucas, emphasized that Australia should be seen as a warning rather than a model. She argued that limiting access to safer nicotine alternatives can push consumers toward illegal markets controlled by criminal networks.
March 19, 2026 by abc.net.au
Australia to toughen tobacco crime laws as cigarette and vape black markets surge
Australia is introducing stricter laws to combat the rapidly growing black market for illegal cigarettes and vaping products. The government is responding to concerns that organised crime groups are increasingly profiting from illicit tobacco sales, which have become widespread across the country. New measures are expected to strengthen enforcement powers, increase penalties, and better target illegal supply chains and retailers involved in the trade. Authorities argue that existing regulations have not been sufficient to curb the problem, as demand for nicotine products continues to fuel underground markets. Overall, the reforms aim to reduce criminal activity, protect public health, and regain control over the legal tobacco and vaping market.
February 25, 2026 by theconversation.com
Prohibitive policies drove organised crime in Australia 100 years ago. It’s happening again
Organised crime in Australia, spanning decades, thrives on illegal markets. Historically, prohibition and stringent regulations drive criminal enterprises, like 1920s razor gangs or recent tobacco wars. Despite efforts to curb illicit activities, escalating enforcement hasn't deterred the trade. Today, illicit drug markets cost billions, with drugs like nicotine rapidly growing. Outcomes mirror past failures when suppressing gambling, drugs, and sex work, reinforcing criminal control. Adjusting regulations, as seen in cannabis decriminalization proposals, can reduce organized crime impact and enhance public safety. Balancing control and legality can combat criminal influence and protect consumers, ultimately weakening organized crime's financial incentives and reducing violence in society.
- Page 1 of 55